Game Product: Character Study

Deluxe Character Sheets Dungeons & Dragons, developed and assembled by Christopher Perkins and Ed Stark, aided by Kim Mohan and Michael Donais, $14.95, Wizards of the Coast, 2004,

This is another D&D entry, so its heavy in jargon. If you're looking for political rants or local history, check elsewhere on the page

This particular product appeared on my chair at work two days ago. At WotC, the designers, developers, and editors get new product from the company (though it often takes a long and sometimes tortuous path to get here) so we have the latest tools. So I got one as well (thanks, guys!). Having just rejoined, I was unaware that this was in the pipeline until it showed up. So note that it was free, and not something I would normally go looking for.

That's because character sheets are in the "nice-but-not-necessary" category of game product. Some people swear by them. Others get by with normal paper (we have an editor in Bill's gaming group who regularly keeps his massively multiclaseed characters on 3 by 5 cards - he also keeps the record of all the facts in the campaign so this trait is overlooked by all). Others photocopy the generic sheet in the book and write very, very small (that would be me). Still others have such specialized needs for their characters that they end up creating their own. And why purchase a book of character sheets when you can download them off the net?

So it was with no little apathy that I unsealed the shrinkwrap and took a look at our latest attempt at character sheets. I mean, we've done this a bajillion times in all the years I've been at TSR, and later WotC. Its going to be a bunch of loose pages, right?

Well, yes and no. Pulling off the paper cover, I note immediately that this is a notebook-style cover with interior pockets. Immediately this is better than most of the similar product I've seen. I'm one of those people that jams my character sheet into the rulebook I happen to be using at the moment. This is . . . nice. Sturdy stock, shots of the 3.5 iconic characters.

And inside, on the pockets, the two tables I'm always checking when I level up - Base Save/Base attack bonus and Experience/Level Dependent Benefits. This is . . . very nice.

The sheets themselves are 4-pagers, which allows enough room to really write on them (most two-page sheets result in a lot of cramped, crabbed handwriting, particularly in the equipment section). Each 4-pager is customized for its particular character - lots of Feat entries for the Barbarians and Fighters, turning rules for the Clerics and Paladins, and the lot. This is . . . really nice.

And the Skill listings have check-marks for which skills are Class Skills. This sounds like a small thing, but it always bothered me on earlier versions that they checked the Skills that your character DIDN'T have. Its a small thing, but I'm pretty pleased they addressed it.

And there's permission to photocopy (I remember incarnations back in the 70s where the company went to great lengths to try to prevent this). And there are d20Modern character sheets as well (and if you play D20 Modern only and eschew D&D, well, deal with it). And there is a generic sheet as well. I actually am excited by all this, and hunt down my friends in the office responsible to congratulate them. This is very, very good.

Is there a downside to these sheets? Sure. Even with the 4-page character sheets, some player characters need more space. Spellcasters in particular need more, and the additional space requirements vary widely according to the class. The Wizard/Sorcerer gets a full additional 4-page signature, whereas the Cleric gets three pages for spells and two pages for domain abilities.The last page of its spell signature is used for Ranger spells, and it shares its domain abilities sheets with Bard spells. Similarly, the Paladin spells shares the same signature with the spells of the Druid, Assassin, and Blackguard. Its a bit of a muddle, but is pretty easy to sort out.

So now I'm bringing over Relique, my Warforged Paladin, to this new setup, since he just leveled up. So I think these sheets are a good thing. And the editor that keeps his characters on 3 by 5 cards? He likes the new sheets such that HE is transposing his current character over. Of course in his case, he's cutting them up and re-photo-copying them, since he double-classes regularly and is just moving into his first Prestige Class..

Anyway, this is one of those products that's worth checking out. Its probably the best set of character sheets since the ancient gold-paper ones done back at the dawn of gaming history. And its a real good DM-to-Gaming-Group gift - one that pays back when the players can find their stuff easily.

More later,

I Win A Million Dollars!

In my dreams. And in this week's Friday Five.

You have just won one million dollars:

1. Who do you call first? Kate, if she's not within shouting distance. Then my folks.

2. What is the first thing you buy for yourself? That laptop I have been promising to get for the past two years. Then pay off the house.

3. What is the first thing you buy for someone else? First I put away college funds for the nieces and nephews. Then I take Kate back to the Kona Village Resort on the big island of Hawai'i to plan world conquest.

4. Do you give any away? If yes, to whom? After making sure family is secure, we've got a large number of causes that get a little boost - Sierra Club, Seattle Rep, Girl Scouts of America - Kate's got a list, of that I have no doubt.

5. Do you invest any? If so, how? Small local businesses - surprisingly staying away from game companies (sorry, guys). I'd like to buy my own Senator, but a million dollars doesn't go as far as it used to, anymore. :(

Coal Mine, Part II

Its interesting what you come up with when you start researching.

On the entry just below, I should note that William Renton was never a resident of Renton, since he died ten years before the town was named, and wouldn't have lived down here anyway, with all the noise and pollution created by his mines.

I also reported the impression that the Renton Coal Company was in operation the full time of its listed life, actually, it was closed for labor troubles for about ten years starting in the 1870's, reopening in 1886 as the Renton Cooperative Coal Company, owned by the workers.

The Black River has an interesting history to it, all its own. In short, it was the original outflow to Lake Washington. Flowing south, and then into the Duwamish river, then out to the sound. Early settlers came up the Black River. When they finished the Montlake Cut and put the Ship Canal in in 1916, the new water level was lower than the Black River, so the river died. I'll have more on this later.

And the town of Slaughter (later renamed Auburn) was originally named for a hero of the Indian War. Yep, the Seattle area had its own Indian War in 1856 or so. I'll have to find out more on this one as well.

Labor troubles, environmental disaster, and a Native American uprising. And I always thought this was just a sleepy suburb.

More later,

Working in a Coal Mine

Nope, this one isn't about the current job. Its about the city of Renton, just north of here.

Benson Avenue, the main artery along the East Hill, starts in the city of Renton itself, right behind the Renton City Hall and the new SAM's Club. It occupies a sliver of land right alongside I-405 at that point, and you head up the hill, there's what looks like the an old bridge support or a gun emplacement along the side of the road - moss-covered concrete with stumps of rebar sticking out of the top.

And there's a plaque mounted to the side of the concrete, and I just can't resist a historical marker. So I pulled over.

The pile of concrete and rebar turns out to be a foundation of a mine car hoist for the Renton Coal Mine. The mine itself operated between 1873 and 1920. The hoist was used to haul coal out of the East Hill, the original entrance now buried under the highway. Mules were used originally. This particular mine ran over a mile into the hill, and branched some 22 times. In its lifetime it took out 1.3 million tons of coal (according to the plaque).

The Renton Coal Mine predates Renton itself. Back then area was known as Black Bridge, for the crossing of the Black River (which as far as I know, is no longer a going concern either, but that may be another story). William Renton was a lumberman who moved up to this neck of the woods in 1850, seeing a need for lumber in Seattle, since the city regularly caught fire in those days (and was rebuilt in wood, so it could burn again - this is what they call today a "repeat purchase model"). Renton did well in lumber, and expanded into rail in order to carry the wood. And when running a planned rail line out to some virgin timber, his associates found coal in the local hills near Black Bridge and William Renton went into the coal business.

(As a digression, there are other coal towns in the area, including Newcastle and Black Diamond. Never thought of them as such, but once you realize it, its kind of obvious from the names).

Anyway, it was the Renton Coal Company until 1886, then became the Renton Cooperative Coal Company until 1907, then was part of Seatle Electic until 1920, when it shut down. Hydro and natural gas replaced coal as an energy source, but the last coal mine (out in Black Diamond) in the area closed in the 1970's.

(This is of particular interest to me, since my home town of Mt. Lebanon, PA - indeed most of southern Allegheny County - was undercut by old mines. My father said that in the 50s you could hear the picks and shovels from the basement of the schools (Which in turn leads to old European stories of Mine Spirits - Knockers and Kobolds, but I'm digressing more than usual)).

Now rural Black Bridge gave way to a larger community of immigrants that came in to mine the coal. And when the town finally incorporated in 1901 (it just celebrated its centennial a few years back), it took as its name that of its leading citizen and its biggest industry - Renton. So the town was named after the business, not the other way around. Which makes sense, because after the whole coal thing went away, the area was primed for ANOTHER company to come in and dominate the landscape - That would be Boeing.

There's more data than you need on coal mining in Renton here. And from the maps it doesn't look like there are any mines directly under this property. But all this is just an interesting exploration that started out with checking out a plaque at the side of the road.

(And there are worse things than living in the town named after a lumber/coal/rail baron. Two communities south, the community was originally named Slaughter. But that's another story).

More later,

I Question the Candidates

So after writing the last entry, I decided to take matters further. Below is an email I have fired off to the various Washington State campaigns asking about their candidates stand on the Open Primary. I will keep you posted on any/all response I get from them.

Dear General/Congressman/Senator/Governor*

On February 7th, Democrats of Washington State will be holding their caucus for nominee for President. Between then and now, I expect to hear a great deal about your positions and those of the other candidates. However, one issue that may be ignored is your stand on Washington's Open Primary.

Washington State is a rarity in this country in that it holds truly open primaries, where anyone can vote for anyone, regardless of political affiliation. The major political parties, both Democrat and Republican, have sensed the potential for mischief, and challenged the legality of this law, which has been on the books since the 1920's. The 9th Circuit Court has agreed with them, and demanded that Washington State abandon its current open primary. The state is appealing the ruling, and the general feeling of the voting population, regardless of political affiliation, is that this ruling is ill-considered and should be overturned.

What is your position on the Open Primary? Should we abandon it, should the court rule in the favor of the political parties, or should we seek an "Louisiana-style" primary (which a few leaders of the state party have already rejected in advance)?

All politics is local, and your opinion on this local issue is important to me and others in Washington State. I will share your response with others at the caucus and on-line. Thank you for your time and effort in this matter.

Yours,

Jeff Grubb

*I would have added Dear Reverend, but Sharpton doesn't have an email contact (his website has probably the most beatific campaign photo ever taken.)

More later

Raucous Caucus

So those readers who have been here a while have noted my discussion of the Primary, or lack thereof, in Washington State this year, and my approval of the fact that the State Legislature had decided to do without it, pocketing nine megabucks in the process.

The reason, for me, is very simple. The Republicans don't need a primary, and the National Democrats announced that they would ignore the primary in favor of a state caucus. (State Democrats pitched the idea that the delegates would be chosen by a combination of caucus and primary, but that idea didn't fly at the National Level. Thanks, guys.)

So the Democratic Caucuses are being held on Saturday morning, February 7th, at a host of locations around the state. If you want to find out where in your area you'd go for this, you can check it out here. If you have your voter-registration card, you can find out where to meet. Otherwise, you can give general location and congressperson and work your want down to it.

Here's what to expect. When you get there, they'll ask you up front that you're a Democrat, and who you're initially supporting. This is no heads-down-on-the-desk secret ballot sort of thing, but democracy red in tooth and claw - you're there because you want someone to win, so you have to say it up front. You don't have to hold to it, but you have to say it up front. You also have to declare you're a Democrat, because, of course, no Republican double-agents would think of infiltrating a caucus to support the weaker candidate.

Next, they get rid of the Dennis Kucinich supporters - I'm sorry, I'm meant to say, candidates that poll less that 15% are deemed "not viable" and their supporters are asked to choose another candidate. Also, if you change your mind, you are allowed to choose another candidate as well. So it goes, until it firms up with percentages for each candidate, and then everyone goes home.

I'm a little fuzzy on this next part, so I have to do my homework, but a percentage of the total carries forward from the local caucuses to the state level, and then to the national convention. Not sure who gets chosen to Boston for the big convention, elected caucus voters, or individuals with orders from the state-level. I'm going to have to do my homework on this.

This sounds like a political rugby scrum, and though I would have to wave my official "Independent" status in order to attend, I find it interesting. For those who would never-in-a-million-years vote Republican, I recommend they find out where their local caucus is, and attend. Weirdly, this type of democracy ensures a greater voice for the individual that shows up than a primary (or, worse still as far as the parties are concerned, an "open primary"). It looks like there will be a lot of new kids at the party, and the worst that happens is that you'll be on a Democrat mailing list.

Yeah, Democrat junk mail. Like I don't get THAT already.

More later,

The Truth? I can't handle The Truth!

So I'm watching the Food Network the other day, and between shows, they switch to local advertisers. And one of them is for a future appearance of Noam Chomsky in the area. It shows a microphone, and has Chomsky's distinctive voice railing against the spineless corporate media and the "conservatives, with their me-first, hypocritical, hate-Everybody attitude", and as you hear his voice, the microphone gets redder and redder and starts to smoke. It was an incendiary commercial that left me stunned for its rabid invective.

Suprised? Of course, since I'm making all of that up. Well, not the existence of a commercial showing a red-hot, smoking mike. The commercial is running, and its for Rush Limbaugh, who bounced from his old local station for for a new home at KTTH, which bills itself as "The Truth" and is the the latest of the red-meat hate-blatherers in the area. And of course, he was whining about the "Liberals, with their hate-America attitude". And it was on the History channel, which most of the gang I know also call the Hitler Channel for its "all-this-and-WWII" programming. And the local feed chose the right show to advertise in - The Barbarians, a wistful look at the heyday of the good old days, when the Strong regularly took stuff from the Weak.

Of course, its OK to pick on Liberals. Its not like moveon.org trying to run an anti-Bush commercial at the Superbowl. That was nipped in the bud, because, you know, its not like they're selling a product or service. That's permissible. But this is a democracy, so you got two choice here. - like it, or lump it.

"I Have Arrived At The Truth," intones Rush in All Caps.

So have I, Rush. The truth is we have to up your medication again.

More later,

New Format

I'm thinking about this as the new format for the blog.

Actually, its a mixing program that puts together my content with another layout. You too can mix your blog with Salon.com or the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. The mixer can be found here.

Thanks to Eric at Mystical Forest for the heads-up. Mina Naguib did the programming.

Thursday Night Gaming

Let me tell you about my D&D character. [Warning: copious use of D&D jargon in the following article. Do not try to operate heavy machinery immediately after reading]

I have a couple regular and semi-regular gaming groups, but the most dependable is the Thursday night game over at Bill Slavicsek’s house. I’ve been playing in it since shortly after I got out to Seattle, and we have a good group of about seven people, with Bill as Game Master. In addition to being the Director of R&D RPG, Bill is also a designer, so his game is often a test-bed for new ideas and a playtest for future projects that are coming (and yeah, I ran this past him to make sure I’m not giving  away too much). The other players are designers, editors, and developers as well, and it tends to be a touchstone for us to both enjoy ourselves and take the latest rules out for a spin.

Previously, we’ve run campaigns in Star Wars d20 (where I ran my wookiee Force Adept Whappamanga), d20 Modern (Moondog Greenberg, the original Tough Hero), and Urban Arcana (Edie Romanova, my Fast Hero/Slayer with a touch of Telepath). Right now its Eberron, which is the big new world that is coming up this summer from WotC.  Our group is currently editor Michele (who's playing Kieran - a Bard verging on the new Inquisitive class),  T’Ed (Cyndar - elven cleric of the Undying Court), Chris (Zagrum – “Zag”, a shifter monk), John (Taylan d’Orien – Dragonmarked rogue with teleport abilities), and Andrew (Claymore – “Clay”, a warforged barbarian –warforged being a new race of living constructs).  I’m running Relique, a warforged paladin. We’re all 5th level.

[And as an aside, Andrew and I are taking our warforged in different directions – I’m doing the more humanistic and social character while Andrew is comfortable with an more combat-oriented version. Data versus Bender. Warforged are going to make a good new character race.]

Now the other thing about Bill’s campaigns is that, as Director, he gets access to a lot of new products and toys that he loves to “spring” on us. With the recent Dungeons & Dragons® Miniatures, that means that he’s pulling out new figures from various stages of development and throwing them at us. More importantly, one of the upcoming sets (not the next one, but the one after that) is introducing huge figures. And these figures are HUGE.

So  in the game we’re after a journal that belongs to a friend of Kieran’s late mentor. We see flashing lights from the library. Relique, who is both impulsive and has initiative, runs into the room, and sees . . .

At this point Bill sets down one of the new HUGES. And it is a monster (I can’t tell you which one – it’s a creature from Eberron – just call it . . . IT).  IT fills the library, as ITs gnome allies are rummaging through, looking for the journal. It is one thing to examine one of these things in an office environment – you look at cast lines, detail, scale. Encountering something like this in play is a heart-stopping experience. (Well, Warforged don’t have hearts, but you get the picture). Barely room to maneuver. An incredible reach. Oh, and Bill added a few new templates to IT to make IT even tougher. We have bitten off more than we can chew. So I try to bluff IT and the gnomes. I’m a paladin – it doesn’t work out. I get slammed into an inopperative state and the rest of the team comes in to take on . . .IT.

And in that one shining moment we become the X-Men -  teamwork over more powerful adversity. Zag is drawing attacks and fighting at full defense, keeping IT occupied. Clay rages and chews huge chunks out of IT. Keiran the bard keeps our offense good with inspire courage, while Cyndar the cleric keeps us on par defensively with shields of faith and other abjurations. Tayland, noted within our group for horribly low hit points, concentrates on the gnomes. I pull my shattered form out of the ITs reach and get an aidspell to get me back online again.

A gnome finds the journal and hides behind IT. Tayland teleports me behind IT (right back into the melee) and I take out the gnome, but Tayland, my low hit die ride, gets slammed into the wall by IT, stranding me. Clay, who has been absorbing huge amounts of damage, crashed in the same round. I prepare for the worst, when Cyndarthe elven cleric puts an adamantine arrow right betweem ITs eyes, taking it down.

Now, one of the concerns I have with the d20 system as it stands is the fragility of the challenge ratings (CRs), a method of determining the strength of an encounter. If you are fighting an opponent of a higher CR, you are in for an uphill battle. If you are fighting one of 2 CRs or higher, you are seriously asking for a world of hurt. Our group would be considered CR 6 – IT started at CR 8 before adding on the templates. The fact that we could balance out the deficit through co-ordinated and cross-supported play was extremely reassuring, since this is exactly the type of play (co-operation, mutual support, party organization) that SHOULD be rewarded.

More later,

A Brief Five

Here is this week's:

At this moment, what is your favorite...

1. ...song? The theme song from Jonny Quest (the original)

2. ...food? Right now I have a major jones for a deep dish spinach and garlic pizza (pepperoni on half), from the Original Chicago in Lake Geneva.

3. ...tv show? Simpsons (followed closely by America's Test Kitchen)

4. ...scent? Air cleaned by a long passage over the Pacific Ocean

5. ...quote? "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." – Dwight D Eisenhower.

Shorter State of the Union Address

Everything's fine. Why do you ask?

On the Road Again: Lunch

Tuesdays are always a pain in that our design group has meetings at 11 and at 1, and if the 11 o'clock meeting runs long, we have to grab a bite fast before the 1 o'clock. Its the nature of the bizz, but on this particular day it saw myself and co-worker Staci driving down to the local Baja Fresh with a small time window for a meal.

So we get down there, park in the clearly marked "Compact" space in front, go in, and get lunch, intent on bringing it back to the office. When we get out, there's a humoungus white Caddy parked in the "Compact" space right next to us. Its one of those 1950's gas-guzzlers with the fins and the collector plates, and has this unfinished white matte coat that looks like its a work in progress. Its also at a 15-degree angle off true, so there is no way to easily back out past it. I manage, though, by Staci guiding me, and with about four inches to spare off the Caddy's back bumper. It takes time we don't have, of course, and we spend the trip back to office mocking the UTTER MAROON that would park a car that big, badly, in a compact space. (And to be fair, we also mocked the white SUV that tried to pull into the compact space we had just carefully vacated).

OK, so its one of those clueless bozo driver that you see on the roads every day, and I thought no more of it. Until I got out of work and found the same White Caddy parked (badly) in front of the company building. Aparently the maroon works for Hasbro/WotC (and with my luck, is a brand manager and reads this blog).

Said it before and will say it again - Whotta Maroon.

More later,

The Blog Goes Ever On And On

So I'm still in the process of deciding what goes into this blog and doesn't. Here's what I come up with:

Reviews: A couple weeks ago I was reading a review column by a gaming professional, in which he admitted that he wasn't reviewing an interesting and well-written product because the publisher hadn't sent him a free copy. I understand this to some degree if he's getting a paid for the review and has to deliver every week or so, though this particular unnamed reviewer is pretty slap-dash with his deadlines, and you know, you'd think he'd at least be curious about it. Anyway, when I review, I notice that I tell you where I got it, how I got it, and why I think its worth reviewing (yes, I read (and watch) more than I review).

Politics: After writing a bit about the national level, I think I'm more comfortable with local politics. I don't have the lack of memory and/or ethics that allows me to declare the Kerry campaign dead in the water one week, then hail its victory the next (I'm talking about the major nets and pundits, here). I tend to think about what I write, which also puts me at a distinct disadvantage. Yeah, there's a lot happening at the top, and I will still throw in when I think there's something to say, but I think there are enough other blogs out there handling the national level on a regular basis.

Seattle: This ties in with local politics - a lot of good blogs are local ones, and I am a fan of Seattle. I'm comfortable with it, and will continue to report of little stuff that I encounter while I'm out and about. I mean, its JANUARY and I took a walk in the park without a hat (woohoo!).

Work: I don't talk about work, except in generally vague terms. Part of that is because this is both a public forum (well, public for me) and a semi-permanent one. A lot of what I work on is still secret at this point, and I'll be glad to reveal my part in it when the various corporate masters announce their own plans (Like the Star Wars Miniatures from WotC, or the big Galactus figure from WizKids), but not before. I saw a presentation copy for a project I was working on over the Christmas break, and it looks FANTASTIC, but of course, I can't say anything else. (hehehe).

Creative Stuff: I'll throw the occasional bit of creativity in every so often. I don't know where it comes from, or where its going, but this is good place to put it. After the poetry below, I got comments ranging from invites to dinner to offers of a suicide watch. No, it won't disuade me from posting again.

Friends: I find that I have a couple levels of rankings when I talk about friends and family. Friends that are bloggers get refered to their own blogs. Friends that are not I am a bit more dodgy about, particularly if the comments are less than flattering. Family I tend to not write anything that would totally freak them out (My mother worries about the weather out here, my brother is a more conservative than I, my sister is back at college - nothing they wouldn't mind the world finding out about).

Rants: Sure, why not? I have this soapbox and everything. I can complain about bad drivers and dumb laws here in the virtual barroom that is the Internet. And if you don't like it, well, you can get your own soapbox.

And behave yourselves, or I'll write more poetry.

More later,

I Take A Day Off

A fire, a market, and ghost soldiers. An interesting Sunday.

I slept 12 hours last night, which might finally catch me up after the Providence trip and beat the aches I've been feeling for the past week. On awakening, I had the choice between working (or at least claiming to be working) on a few projects or taking the day off. I chose the latter.

Drove north along I-5 past Boeing Field and saw the smoke rising from the area between the airfield and the sports stadiums - an area of docks, warehouses, and light industry. As I drove north the smoke darkened and took on a thick, black, pillow-like texture that drifted north towards the city proper.

I took the next exit, and got there after the fire trucks had deployed, and about the same time as the press. The area near the fire was the aforementioned light industry and warehouses, but mixed with some private housing and commercial shops. Most of the crowd gathered near a local grocery store/resturant, and they pulled up the blinds so the diners could get a good view.

It was a manufacturing plant, the middle of three identical warehouses that dominated its block - a metal fabrication operation, making dumpsters, ship containers, and other heavy items. The outer walls themselves looked metallic and unharmed, but the timbers and roof had already caught fire, and the HVAC units disappeared as they lost their support and collapsed into the building's shell. Details are here.

Channel 7 was interviewing people watching, keying on those that weren't wearing jackets (locals who might know something). Channel 4 had a crane camera up a responsible distance away. Three sets of cameramen clustered with the paramed team, getting the shots of the boom hose fighting against the now-visible flames. I counted a dozen engines from my vantage point, and there were firemen on the roofs of the adjacent buildings, trying to keep the flames from spreading.

I watched for a while from across the main road. The police sealed off traffic easily, and the crowd (I'd say about a hundred people) were well-mannered and out of the way. The firefighters had to move the media away in order to get one of the trucks in, then made up for it by having one of the firefighters get the cameras to a closer-but-still-safe vantage point. I stayed for a while (until the air conditioning unit fell in), then headed north under the grey-black cloud into the city.

Hit Pike Street Market for a few gifts for Kate for her birthday. Kate's birthday was well over a week ago, and even though she swore she just wanted dinner out, she had a few things she's been wanting, and this was the first chance I'd had to get out to get them since Christmas. The south surburban malls had proved singularly unhelpful, so I counted on the Pike to have what I was looking for.

For the non-Seattlite readers, Pike Place was at one time the "Fresh Produce" sanitary market in the city, perched on the hillside overlooking the piers and rails (where a lot or the food came in). Its a four-to-seven story structure, honeycombed with shops, craft-sellers, food joints and still, fresh produce. For Pittsburghers, think of the Strip District stacked on its side. (Oh yeah, Pike Place is the place where they throw fish. If you're out of town, you do the fish-throwing thing).

Anyway, it was pleasant shopping there, because the Pike is between seasons - Christmas season has just passed, and Tourist season hasn't kicked in. As a result, the vendors are a bit more chatty, the street performers (it is awash with them as well) a little more bouncy, and crowds a lot more subdued. Ended up talking with people; talking about jade with the storeowner from who I bought an imperial jade pendant, and chatted about plastic casting and toy soldiers with a vendor named Daniel Leen, who made replica jewelry based on Northwest Coast native designs (I picked up a pendant from him as well, of Raven Bringing Fire, which seemed appropriate given the blaze earlier in the day). And I found a new beret for Kate at the place ("Lidwear") where I had got her her scarf-hat two years previous. For myself, of course, I snacked my way through my travels - Cookies and cheese and piroshkis (the tip jar at the piroshki joint states "The Cold War is over - We Appreciate the Change!"). Picked up mozeralla and rosemary garlic bread as well.

And then out to Kite Hill, to see the soldiers, but they were gone. Again, for those from not around here, Kite Hill is a low bare rise on the former Sand Point military post which has been turned into a park. About two years ago, the Monolith appeared there. This year someone had set up nine plywood figures, eight of them soliders with mirrored faces facing a saluting officer. The park authorities stated the squad of figures could remain until March, when the kite fliers take over the hill in earnest.

Except the soldiers were gone. The area was alive with people who came out to see the soldiers, only to find that they have disappeared (which then asks the question that if people are seeking the art, does the art still achieve its goal if its not there?). I haven't seen any news on this one yet, but it was a good day for a walk, and most of the people I talked to were good natured about the sudden appearance, and equally sudden disappearance, of the art. Maybe they'll turn up in Greenlake, like the Monolith did.

Back home in daylight, and got the presents wrapped before Kate got home from work, so I got to surprise her. Dinner of shrimp pasta with a jaelpeno pepper sauce, and she loved the gifts (AND I found her sunglasses, which she was sure she had lost as well). She's curled up downstairs watching Cirque du Soliel on the CBC channel, and I'm updating, then retiring for the evening.

An interesting day off. How was yours?

Deeper Meanings

Yaknow, these online personality tests can be addictive.


The Bermuda Triangle:

Gotta catch 'em all.

Fnord.


Which Illuminati are you?
brought to you by Quizilla

More later,

Play: The Little Hostages

Living Out written by Lisa Loomer, Directed by Sharon Ott, Seattle Rep Theatre.

I think its no secret that I’m not terribly comfortable with babies. I don’t dislike them - I find them sweet and soft and gurgle-filled, and there is no creature on the planet that looks cuter when drooling. But I’m always fearful of how fragile they are, and if they’re comfortable when I hold them, and what happens if they cry when I hold them, and all that. Part of it is a case of over-protectiveness, in which I want to keep them safe from the clumsiest thing in the area – which usually me.

[Kate, on the other hand, is a master at baby-wrangling. Given a room full of people, a small baby, and Kate, within five minutes she’ll be holding the small baby. I have seen this happen at offices. I have seen this happen at parties. I have seen this happen on airplanes. She is fearless, and of course, babies sense that and trust her completely.]

The reason I mention all this is the play Living Out, at the Rep, which deals with the problem of work and family. In particular, people who hire women to look after their kids, often women who have kids of their own. Its the balance of employment and children for all sides, and the madening frustration of a society that grants, to quote one characters badly "The ability to do it all but to not do any of it well".

So there are babies and children in the play, and the theme of the play is watching over them. The economy of plays states that if you mention a gun in act I, then its going to be fired by act III. So I have a feeling of dread because, under the law of how plays operate, you KNOW something bad is going to happen, and there are such a plethora of small potential victims. How dare the playwrite, thinks I, put these small (fictional) children at risk? How dare you hold them hostage? So I went in with a feeling of unease.

Which is a pity, because this is a extremely well-written and well-acted play that underscores both the divide of family and work, and the great divide of wealth and poverty in this country. Stephanie Diaz play Ana, an El Salvadorian woman working as a nanny for more wealthy white Angelenos. Ana has two kids in turn, one in El Salvador with her grandmother, and the other here in the states by her new husband. To get work, she tells her new employer that both children are in El Salvador, and that simple lie spins things out as Ana tries to serve both her natural family and her employer's family.

Lisa Loomer's writing is natural, and her characters are human, even the broadest of them. The conflicts are very, very human, and the arguments, when they come, are completely believable - sliding all over the place. Its got great lines and solid laughs. Yeah, solid laughs - its a comedy, but in that hyphenated school of serio-comedy or tragi-comdedy or socio-comedy. Which means - don't get too comfortable, its not going to end well. Which is sort of the spectre that hangs over the entire proceedings - if children are involved, someone's going to be hurt.

And of course I am taken in. I come to care about these characters - they are well-shaped by the playwrite, and well-rounded by the actors. This was a top-flight cast, top to bottom, and in addition to Ms. Diaz, kudos to Julie Briskman, who has become a Rep Veteran, a friendly face to the audience. Ms. Briskman reaches out as the Ana's well-meaning, harried, occasionally clueless but deeply human employer. The directing was also amazingly smooth, using an open stage to shift between households and unite Ana's two families on one stage.

This was a good one. Its got a short run, so go see it now.

More later,

An Odd Five

And if I'm not bummed out enough, this week's five is rather odd in the sense of age and mortality.

1. What does it say in the signature line of your emails?
Nothing at the moment. My emails are used for both personal and professional purposes, so a glib email may be out of place. The last sig line I had read:
"Its a Barnum and Bailey World
Just as phony as it can be
But it wouldn't be make-believe
If you believed in me."

2. Did you have a senior quote in your high school yearbook? What was it? If you haven't graduated yet, what would you like your quote to be?
I attended a huge high school, and we weren't big on quotes.

3. If you had vanity plates on your car, what would they read? If you already have them, what do they say?
ISHI Named after a comic book character I created named Ishi Barasume. The name was also used by the last of the "uncivilized" Indians of California, and, I am informed by a fellow writer, was also a childhood name for boogers.
DRBUNNY Named after my wife's long-standing character in a Star Wars Roleplaying Game. Three weeks after we applied for the plates, that character died. A lot of people want to know if I'm a veternarian.

4. Have you received any gifts with messages engraved upon them? What did the inscription say?
None that I know of.

5. What would you like your epitaph to be?
If I'm not here, just hang about.
[Thinks about it a moment, then adds]
More Later,

More later,

Run for your lives! It's Poetry!

I don't write poetry, but today was a muddy, confused day - awakening from moody, water-soaked dreams to about five things that needed to be done at once, and all at the end of a week that has left me exhausted. So in the middle of the afternoon, I put this down. I have no idea if it goes anywhere, but hey, you're here, so let's try it.

Talking Shop
J. Grubb

Business is down
said Bob the funeral director
signalling for his regular margarita
(Double, lime and salt
served in a glass tumbler)
You would think otherwise
times are tough
people are nervous.
Know they won't live forever.
Think of the future, we say
the Survivors
the Heirs.
Don't be a burden
plan in advance.
Now people think of the future
and see bad times
hard times, why pay
for a plot when you might be
scattered with the airframe shards
over some farm town?
entombed in a collapsed structure?
flash-fried, your body stacked
with all the other unfortunates?
Deep sigh and that first sip.
No one really wants to think of the future.

More later,

States of Mind

So this is the latest in Bloggerdom - a listing of the states (and a territory and a district) to see which ones you have lived in, visited, or visited briefly. Just for our files, so we can keep track of your movements:

Underline = lived there
Bold = slept there
Italic = been there

AL ALABAMA
AK ALASKA
AZ ARIZONA
AR ARKANSAS
CA CALIFORNIA
CO COLORADO
CT CONNECTICUT
DE DELAWARE
DC DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FL FLORIDA
GA GEORGIA
HI HAWAII
ID IDAHO
IL ILLINOIS
IN INDIANA
IA IOWA
KS KANSAS
KY KENTUCKY
LA LOUISIANA
ME MAINE
MD MARYLAND
MA MASSACHUSETTS
MI MICHIGAN
MN MINNESOTA
MS MISSISSIPPI
MO MISSOURI
MT MONTANA
NE NEBRASKA
NV NEVADA
NH NEW HAMPSHIRE
NJ NEW JERSEY
NM NEW MEXICO
NY NEW YORK
NC NORTH CAROLINA
ND NORTH DAKOTA
OH OHIO
OK OKLAHOMA
OR OREGON
PA PENNSYLVANIA
PR PUERTO RICO
RI RHODE ISLAND
SC SOUTH CAROLINA
SD SOUTH DAKOTA
TN TENNESSEE
TX TEXAS
UT UTAH
VT VERMONT
VA VIRGINIA
WA WASHINGTON
WV WEST VIRGINIA
WI WISCONSIN
WY WYOMING

(You know, after all the typesetting commands, it would have been just easier to generate some content. Bwah hah hah)

More later,

Alliterates

Part of the reason for this entry is reassure the other members of my writer's group that I have navigated safely home from Redmond after three margaritas and way too many diet cokes. But its also a chance to let the rest of the world know about the Alliterates, or rather the West Coast Alliterates.

The first Alliterates writer's group was founded by Robert J. King in the Lake Geneva, Wisconsin area, and is still a going concern. Its always been eight members, meeting at a local house or just as often a local bar, such as the Jury Room in Elkhorn. The web site, updated about once every two months or so, is here, and all those who have been midwestern members are listed at that site.

Almost all the Allits were TSR authors, designers, or editors, and the common experience continues to this day. But we do grow up and move on, and a number of us are no longer in the Wisconsin area. Thomas Reid is now in Texas, and Steve Winter, myself, and Dave Gross ( also known as Frabjous Dave) are in the Seattle area. After much goofing around, the three of us (with Dave as the driving force) chose to form a West Coast Branch of the team and continue the tradition.

The West Coast gang numbers seven - the Three Former Wisconsin Allits, plus Wolf "The Monkey King" Baur, Stan! "The Stannex" Brown, Magic author Jess LeBow and former Paizo honcho Johnny Wilson. We get together once a month, though unlike the Midwestern branch, we have yet to find a regular meeting place - candidates to date have included such diverse places as the Whistle Stop, The Giant's Causeway, the Conor Byrne Pub, and the Rendezvous. Last night it was Big Time Pizza in Redmond, a nice place with good food across the street from a Half-Price Bookstore. Johnny didn't make this one and Steve was late due to a family commitment, but everyone else was there.

What happens there? We drink, eat, and talk. We used to smoke cigars, but there are former smokers and allergic folk in both teams, so that practice has fallen by the wayside. We talk about a number of things - industry gossip, movies (Dave is a bug for foreign and indy films), job opportunities, our lives, and our work. In particularly our work. On a good month, one or two of the gang will bring something in and the rest of the guys will draw their long knives and critique it.

This particular evening was a bumper crop. Stan!, Wolf, and I all have short stories due for an upcoming anthology (More on that as we go forward). Dave had the opening chapters of his next Forgotten Realms novel for WotC. A lot of the gang come from a editing background, so line edits are in their blood. It was a really productive evening - I got a lot of good stuff for my revision, Wolf and Stan have solid entries, and Dave has probably one of the best prologues for an FR book I've read in several years (which does the task of foreshadowing and bringing the reader up to speed while at the same time providing a wonderful little vignette of the Realms). No blood was spilled, though a lot of red ink dripped from the pages by the end of the evening.

All in all a very productive night, though I am exhausted. And so to bed.

More later,

Bush=Kennedy

So the heavily-reported non-news this week that there will be news next week about the US returning to space is kinda interesting. Are we serious about this? Is this because of the success of our Mars probe? Is this because we're falling behind Europe, Japan, and China? Is it because of the Columbia? Is this a national pride thing, or a science thing, or an aerospace bailout thing, or what?

Me, I was struck once again by the similarities of this administration and one forty years ago, when we last declared we were going into space. Let's take a look at the similarities between GWB and JFK.

I'll pause here are both my right-o and left-o center friends do a spit take. How can I compare the two? One's the best thing that has happened to the White House in years, and the other is a corrupt, secretive, boneheaded buncha yahoos (note that I'm not saying which is which). Yet the further we go into this administration, the more the comparisons crop up. Fer example:

Political Dynasty: Joe Kennedy versus George senior. Actually, the Bush dynasty goes back to Prescott Bush of Connecticut, the grandfather, but both are from political families. And both families have skeletons in the closet that have been regularly dragged out (Joe dealt with bootleggers, supposedly, Prescott with Nazis, supposedly). Such accusations are ruminated upon by opponents, ignored as irrelevant by supporters, but the fact remains that neither patriarch let stuff, people, or facts get in their way.

Contested Election: Everyone knows about 2000, but 1960 was a real squeaker as well, with a few votes in Illinois making the difference. Make that a few votes in Cook County. Make that a few votes in the Cook County controlled by Chicago's Boss, Mayor Daley (There's another political "family business"). And yeah, the fact it was so close was used (repeatedly) against the victor.

Faith: Big hubbub at the time - would the White House take orders from the Vatican? Big hubbub at the present - does the White House take orders from the Christian Right?

Infamatory Catch-phrases: "Ich Bin Ein Berliner" verus "Bring It On". And while we're on the subject - compare flying into Baghdad with visiting a West Berlin surrounded by Soviet Bloc forces. Both men have a flair for delivery.

Bad Intel: Yesterday: Missile Gap. Today: WMDs. Yesterday: The Cuban people will welcome us with open arms after we come ashore at Bay of Pigs. Today: The Iraqi people will welcome us with open arms after we take Baghdad.

Hubris: The administration of 1960 labled itself "the best and the brightest", and then landed us in the quagmire of Vietnam. The administration of 2000 remains in danger of the same thing in South Asia. But both teams were so sure of themselves.

Family: Presidential brother? Check. Politically powerful brother? Check. Potentially embarressing brother? Check. Jack, Bobbie, and Teddy versus George, Jeb, and Neil (whose messy divorce is dislodging all sorts of flotsam - Two million bucks from a mainland Chinese company to serve as an consultant? Good lord).

A Compliant Media: For all the boo-hissing at the Fox Newses of the world, in earlier days there was Henry Luce and the Time-Life Empire, trading access for spin and setting the tone for the rest of the US Media (I got the Neil Bush stuff off the BBC).

The Final Frontier: And now a dedicated space effort. Much as NASA overturned previous military thinking towards space, so will a new initiative change the ground rules for how we look at space exploration (for the past two decades it has been baby-steps, small missions, and doing the best with what we have).

Anyway, the more I look at it, the more the present administration seems to hark back to the previous one (I've also got some Clinton/Reagan hookups, but nothing as clear as these). There are some differences (war record, union problems, and JFK and his Veep DIDN'T get along), but for the most part, there's a strong set of similarities between the two administrations.

Does this mean anything? Is there a plot afoot here, or do our political and social mechanisms produce similar results over time?

As a former co-worker of mine puts it - "I'm not saying anything. I'm just saying."

More later,